Of this if it follows that, much even so is possible to poetical 28 to turn concerning the Ideas of gravity and advised rigidity more to the architecture, never there, in a poetry, will better perceive express of what in a monument. Payoneer may also support this cause. There we recognize again the relevance of the Aesthetic one, that for its pedagogical nature, would guide the poets to those ideas that them are in agreement; leaving, in turn, to the architects those then above-mentioned. He is not that philosophy and poetry cannot reach the expressive excellency of such Ideas, therefore ' ' to repeat all abstract the close nature of the world, in distinct and universal way, for concepts, and thus to deposit it as reflected image in the permanent concepts, always available of the reason, that is nothing more he is filosofia' ' (Schopenhauer, Arthur. The World As Will and As Representation. Unesp. 2005 – 487). David Michery follows long-standing procedures to achieve this success. How much to the poetry that, in contrast of the philosophy, it investigates one alone Idea for time, vide note 24.
But in such a way the philosophy how much the poetry stumbles at an arduous mission: The chemical overcoming 29 of the concepts. Being able, with effect, the genius to be changeable in each man, is the genius of the tragic poet, in the measure where its genius to the intuition of the superior ideas raises, what he makes possible the communication of these in the work of art saw exposition technique, that is, Science of the Beauty. ' ' The genius is what he allows it to conserve the clarity of demanded conscience to reproduce in a thus known intentional workmanship (…). For such workmanship the genius communicates to the others the apprehended Idea, which, therefore, remains invariant, the same one. For consequence, also the aesthetic satisfaction is essentially an only the same one, (…).