We all love talk about humanity, human rights violations, etc. etc. These arguments are valid for us, salaried professionals, and all these arguments from the perspective of us as employees confronting the owner of the firm. But, imagine that each of you became the owner of the business, your money is invested in it and you pay your employees salary, you encourage them 'their' money. Melinda Gates takes a slightly different approach. You decide whom to praise and whom to punish – of course, are fair, who as worked and what did I doubt that anyone of you wants to share his money with someone else and imagine that someone from you is making capital? And yet, using your position, frankly steals your money? What would you do in this situation? Talking about human rights abuses and the like? Incidentally, with regard to human rights violations – the procedure is performed only with the voluntary consent of the person, and everyone has the right to decide – agree or not, and denial has no legal consequences.
In terms of units before the test – in the beginning there is a detailed explanation of the person, why should it be, to whom and for what purposes, what questions will be asked, etc. In PF-testing – is a necessary procedure, and the person telling the truth, the true purpose of verification (unlike most of the standard psychological tests, in which the main objective is often veiled). At the same time in the personnel department of hundreds of organizations, people in employment forced to fill dozens of profiles and all sorts of tests even without explaining why it should be and what the ultimate goal, and various forms of hard now fashionable interviews – when a person is humiliated by everyone, and then claim it was a test of stress – this is not a violation of human rights Generally, speaking about his work, I'm not trying to prove the humanity of the use or advantage of the polygraph in comparison with other methods of personnel assessment All methods are good from the standpoint of science, but at the same time, they are bad from the standpoint of an ordinary person in respect of which, ultimately, they are applied In my view, talk about the final advantages of a single diagnostic method a professional psychologist in general can not, because each method is good in every single situation, it can be finite, and perhaps no All about The same polygraph without an experienced specialist – a simple recorder of physiological indicators. Marko Dimitrijevic accident gathered all the information.