In the week that marks the independence of Brazil, it is common to remember the historical process that gave origin to this conquest, long years under the control of Portugal, but leaving of side ' ' estria' ' that it is contacted in them, and, analyzing the last years, we perceive so that dreamed independence this a little distant. Either the economic dependence, cultural politics or, Brazil in these 189 years never can feel the autonomy that would like, and now we come across in them with a confusion of institucional problems that to be able has narrowed them of management. To complicate, following our crises politics, the economic development of the country also occurs, growth never imagined for that had witnessed years of inflation, exactly the world-wide economy being to the side of the contraction. In this direction, Brazil has been seen world-wide as an excellent option of investment, considering the consolidation of its domestic market. However, so that it has market economy and increase of external investments, if it makes necessary to the creation of adequate laws that guarantee the legal security of the businesses, a modern regulation will only allow a continuous development of the economy without embarrassments. In the practical plan, what if it perceives is the institucional crisis that occurs in the legislative and executive, as well as the state creating obstacles for the growth of the companies, when it would have to provide new incentives.
The international rumor of that the right is not taken enough the serious one in Brazil, has reasons many times happened for the examples of our governmental cupola. Thus, what it is perceived is that the difficulty biggest is to place the institutions in full functioning, the country suffers of a basic problem, we live a reliable crisis. In this direction, in result of the omission and the bureaucratization of the legislative and executive, as well as in reason of the incredulity that such institutions has faced, the judiciary power has assumed a transforming role. Dangerous situation, therefore in some cases we have folloied the judiciary power indirectly legislating. However, exactly before the ministerial scandals, since the times of President Collor, we observe the problems caused for the said Presidentialism of Coalition, expression that appeared in 1988 with the scientist politician Sergio Abranches, which identified that the Executive would only make possible the implantation of its politics with a parliamentary base, with an ample coalition of different parties, exactly with contrary partisan lines of direction. However, this format politician has caused serious damages to the country, and the inquietude of a population instructed, allied the ample spreading of content for the Internet, the new indications of a movement of transformation of the position well politics of the population, and, a reform politics never so was clamada. If in the past we fascinated the independence of our colony, now we dream of the disruption of the current politics. An important step is to start for a reform politics that it can eliminate the commercialization of as many interests, breaching with the necessity of the manager to have an allied base to make possible its politics.