Noise Pollution

Certified specialist lawyer for rental and property law Alexander Bredereck and lawyer Dr. Attila Fodor Berlin, it is an ugly idea: A self-employed person or a company rents an Office in the hope of exerting there productive mental work. For spiritual work, you need rest. Shortly after feeding and beginning of creativity in the own Office Windows, a beach bar opens. Morning till the late evening hours penetrates music in the Office space. A concentrated work is no longer possible.

A reduction in rent shrugging takes note of the landlord. The enormous investment that would make the Office room soundproof, not worth it for the landlord. What few know: the law provides for an extraordinary termination of the lease by the tenant for these cases. The rental use is partially withdrawn by the noise. And entitled to the cancellation by the tenant. Generally, the tenant of the landlord but must warn and gives it is figuring out long time to remedy must concede. The landlord must have had at least the chance to build the expensive sound-insulating Windows.

Other reasons that lead to the partial subsequent withdrawal of the leased property, are: health of hazardous mold or other health hazardous, blocking the entrance area of the shop through a construction site, etc. Specialist Attorney tip commercial tenants: Should be bound by a long-term commercial lease, want to leave it but prematurely, it is worth to check whether the use of the leased property is restricted. This is the case, this not only the rent is reduced. An extraordinary termination of the lease is possible after prior warning. Consult with prior to saying the immediate termination by a specialist. If the termination is unfounded, claims for damages are threatening. Specialist Attorney tip commercial lessor: Because a bagatelle a tenant can’t quit the commercial lease. Should prematurely terminate a tenant due to denial of use, must he the usurpation is usually a lack of subsequently occurring prove. The lack may be also predictable upon conclusion of the rental agreement as closing a gap in the inner city area and causing the construction noise. A post by lawyer for rental and property law Alexander Bredereck and lawyer Dr. Attila Fodor Berlin E-mail:

Munich

urgent. The needs Brooks no delay, if for example the parents both work, and an otherwise caring for the child cannot be ensured. The amount of costs for unused spare place in the initiative of the parents may be finally not inappropriate. It should be noted that scale can be not the parent contribution for a nursery place, but the high cost of subsidies for a such place in looking at investments for the equipment as well as personnel costs. About the so-called reservation of additional costs is the adequacy anyway, that isn’t about taking a special desire of the non-custodial, but the refusal of the fulfilment of the legal claim is averted with their consequences. According to the legal situation the legal right to a kindergarten place entitled to first child, as from the wording in section 24 para 1 SGB VIII and article 5 Paragraph 1 gives KitG Rhineland-Palatinate (“children are entitled to education, training and support in the kindergarten of the second years of age until the entry of the school”). Entitled as well as custodial parents according to the legal concept but of the Court’s opinion.

For promoting at the same time legally intended parents speaks of promoting purpose coming to the expression in various legal provisions. Although the “education and training” in the sense of 5 para 1 sentence 1 applies the children themselves KitG. The purpose of “service” favors the custodial, who are relieved in part in so far but at the same time. Indeed also section 24 (4) speaks of having the public youth organisations to inform parents who “want to use benefits among other things according to 24 para 1”, and to advise SGB VIII. Finally, the legislator has the goals and objectives of youth welfare planning, is responsible for ensuring that the case in question offer, SGB VIII then determined No. 4 in section 80, paragraph 2, that “Facilities and services” should be designed, that particular “mothers and fathers family and work tasks better can reconcile”. It is expressed that it would be unnatural in the face of today’s living conditions and the demographic development, to assume the legal right to a kindergarten place serve not least, the professional development of the parents and the reconciliation of professional activity the exercise of parental responsibility in the family. Parents whose place of residence municipalities cannot solve the legal right to a kindergarten place from 1 August this year should be therefore examine how some substantial claims for damages are entitled to.

A Munich firm prepared currently together with the Kita-in the respective municipalities pattern suits. Concerned parents should contact with the Kita-Verein in conjunction. The Munich lawyer and Chairman of the Kita Association Prof. Dr. Volker Thieler has already in 2012 the book the KITA lawsuit: claims by “Parents for not granting a daycare center: access – compensation reimbursement” written. There can check the parents about their rights and enforcement. The book is published in the Alexandra Publishing House.

Jan Korte

While it has the detective agency Lentz a main target made (www.lentz-detektei.de/ company profile), at Court as well as to prepare for possible legal disputes in all over Germany and from abroad to impose the interests of their clients. Effectively to implement these goals, work at the detective agency Lentz in the first place with Oberservationen. “Limit through video surveillance ‘ the right to one’s own picture legally the detective area too strong a,” so Marcus Lentz, Managing Director of the detective agency Lentz. VP – Corporate Planning has compatible beliefs. Video records are suitable for use as evidence difficult before German courts if they secretly made no proper identification of the offender, E.g. a>. by hats, Hoody or similar leave them on public ground (road staircase) usually held not by appropriate signs, such as department stores, will be announced according to Marcus Lentz replaced thus a covert Detective video surveillance usually no observation of man is the perpetrator red-handed””. Secretly made video surveillance in the private sector or in the private sector could so quickly the proof recycling ban”are subject to and are therefore by no means a panacea.

Also the left Parliamentary Deputy Jan Korte looks more video recordings rather sceptical about the claims and said: “No video camera will assassin of them hold, to carry out attacks”. Jan Korte relies more on an increased use of the police, and therefore calls for the downsizing of the police to stop. This approach truncates the citizens not so much in their rights as an extension of the video recordings. For further information on the investigation methods of the Detektei Lentz, as well as insights into current examples of the Detektei Lentz can be read under /, the Firmenstzruktur of Lentz group is shown under.

Negative Effects Of Internship Remuneration

The Tax Office informed home from Augsburg in the today’s business students who do an internships are not uncommon. In some cases, an internship is remunerated by the undertaking concerned, to compensate for the expenses of the trainees. According to a ruling of the German of the 09.06.2011 this revenue can affect however negative child benefit of the students. Accountant Gerhard clarifies home from Augsburg over the details of the judgment. A student, whose focal point was, in the residence of the parents took an internship in the United States to basis of the judgment of the BFH in the underlying case. There paid internship compensation and other income of the students, but its revenue exceeded the annual limit amount of 8004,00 euros. The exceeding of the limit amount through the income of the student, extinguished the claims of his parents on child support.

As a result, the parents submitted the cost of accommodation and meals incurred during an overseas internship and wanted them in the framework of the tax declaration claim. In principle, this is possible if the focal point of the student in the parental household and the student has rented an apartment on the place of study. Incurred expenses for rent and food can then be made within the double financial management. The issue in this case was, however, that is been abandoned their own residence in Germany and rented a residence in the United States. According to the Federal fiscal court, hereby the basics of double financial management and associated claims shall expire. The Augsburg accountant Gerhard home gives you like to more information and advise you what options you have to be able to assert claims in an internship abroad. Press contact tax law firm home contact person: Gerhard home accountant clinker mountain 9 86152 Augsburg phone: 0821/344 88-0 fax: 0821 / 344 88-50 E-Mail: Homepage: