The Perspective

What to make for the overcoming of this mistake of the race human being? To follow, one I break up of the text of Tomaz Tadeu Da Silva (2004): … the affirmations on difference alone make sensible if understood in its relation with the affirmations on the identity …. The affirmations on difference also depend on a chain, in general occult, of negative declarations on (others) identities. Identity and difference are, therefore, non-separable …. It has in this I break up the estimated one of that ' ' if I am what I am obviously the other is that ' ' , that is, the different one also has its proper identity that must be respected and be valued It seems redundant, but let us take a simple example: if in we affirm Brazilians to them is for the simple fact of whom we need to identify our nationality, a time that exists other human beings that are not Brazilian. Thus, the differences are seen as wealth and not barriers: I learn with different and it with me; we are different in the questions physical, cultural, religious, etc., however we are equal in the identity human being, with all the inherent rights and duties to our condition.

The question of the preconception if of the one for the absence of reflection, the blind ignorance, the egoism It has that to rethink itself in the education as separatistas and exculpatory barrier in addition. the base of it is in the infantile education, a time that in the simple act of playing, planned evidently well pedagogically, the child constructs in its reality concepts as ethical, solidarity and peace. A group of children in the pertaining to school space imagines that has respected its right to learn playing and participates actively of the process; each child understands thus, gradual, the world to its redor, feels itself motivated to the letramento will enable that it to read the life References HISS, Tomaz Tadeu, Identity and Difference: The Perspective of Cultural Studies, Publishing company Voices, Ed. 5, 2004.